Your brain assumes that "old history" has survived because it is good. The passage, however, argues the opposite: old history survives because it served the powerful. The correct answer will be precise: "It systematically omitted non-literate societies." The wrong answer will be overbroad: "It is completely false."
[A] For most of the 20th century, the historian's craft was solitary: a scholar in an archive, turning brittle pages. However, the last twenty years have witnessed a methodological revolution driven by computation. Digital history does not merely mean scanning books; it entails the algorithmic analysis of vast corpora— newspapers, census data, court records—at scales previously unimaginable. New Ways Of Looking At History Reading Answers
"Traditional historical narratives often presented the Industrial Revolution as a triumph of technological progress. However, new social historians, drawing on the methods of the Annales School, shifted focus to the lived experiences of factory workers. They examined not only wages but also diet, health, and leisure. Meanwhile, environmental historians have added a further layer, showing that the exploitation of coal and water resources was not merely an economic choice but an ecological transformation with long-term consequences." Your brain assumes that "old history" has survived